Choir’s Supreme Status Comes at Great Cost
February 18, 2020
The choir department is well-known for its dazzling performances, which often include an expert technical team, thousands of dollars worth of set-pieces and lighting equipment, and backup musicians in addition to the vocalists we see on stage.
Choir is the undisputed Godzilla among electives on our campus, with about 300 students enrolled in its classes. On top of what the school district covers, the department is fueled by the Campolindo Choral Music Education Fund, to which donors give thousands of dollars annually, according to Financial Technician Jannine Takahashi-Crow.
Our school musical is basically an opportunity to see a Broadway-level show for $25. It includes 3 different casts, months of grueling preparation, and hours of mandatory rehearsals. However, putting on such an elaborate production each year and maintaining 6 different vocal groups, the choir department both negatively impacts other elective programs and places unusual stress on its own participants.
For our vocal music program to be the giant that it is, other course options suffer. For instance, the drama department cowers in the tiny backstage closet of the Campolindo Performing Arts Center (CPAC) for long stretches of the year.
During the preparation and production cycle of the musical, drama students cannot even step foot on the CPAC stage for a majority of the 3rd quarter. According to former drama student, junior Sahaana Rajesh, during the musical season, drama classes practice in the dressing room. “We worked with what we had,” she said.
Choir teacher Mark Roberts explained that he collaborates with the heads of drama and orchestra to create a schedule for the CPAC a year in advance. “If drama’s in there, everybody else is out. If the musical is in there, everybody else is out. If [band or orchestra] in there, everybody else is out,” Roberts said.
Drama teacher Chris McNevin confirmed that when the musical is going on, drama has to “stay away” from the CPAC.
McNevin would like to add another drama performance in the spring, but with the musical’s monopoly on the theater, it would be a challenge. “With the little amount of time we have in the theater to do rehearsals and tech because of the very busy schedule that exists right now, it would have to be very low tech,” he said.
The many choral groups on campus dominate the headlines. Yet, the intensity with which they operate contributes in its own way to the high levels of stress that continue to be synonymous with our campus.
While the district has made efforts in recent years to support student mental health, such as implementing the Wellness Center and putting a cap on the amount of homework teachers can assign, choir students often miss class to keep up with their rehearsal schedules.
For example, the department takes biannual field trips; this year, vocalists are headed to Montreal, Canada. So, on top of the missed class time many of them accrue as a result of long musical rehearsals where academic responsibilities are postponed, or going on retreats, or prancing through the halls delivering “Valentine grams” during an entire school day, these same students will be absent again as they display their talents in foreign lands.
Yet the Campolindo choir couldn’t be what it is without such student commitment. Many vocalists take 2 or more periods of choir in their schedules.
Choir students are notorious for the many hours they spend rehearsing. “I don’t see it as really any different than participating in sports and practices,” said Roberts.
According to junior Emma Dillard, a member of Chamber Choir and participant in the musical, there is “a learning curve” with managing time during the musical season, as the rehearsals are lengthy. Nevertheless, Dillard still wanted to participate.
While the musical can be a burden, Roberts says that students put it on themselves. According to Roberts, the musical is completely optional to choir students. In trying out, however, 1 is committing to the full responsibility of attending rehearsals and all that the show entails. While “ensemble roles have significantly less rehearsal time than principal roles,” Roberts noted that the upcoming musical is unique in that there are several leads.
Dillard already manages 2 periods of choir in her schedule, as many of the veteran choir members do. While this admittedly prevents Dillard from being able to take other classes in which she might have an interest, Dillard doesn’t believe “that choir blocked [her] from taking them.
“I really wanted to be as much a part of the program as I could and I understood that meant 2 of my class periods would be choir,” Dillard said.
“My students who choose to participate in 2 choirs, obviously, that’s a choice that they make, a commitment they want to make. They want to learn more and excel,” said Roberts.
There is also an exclusivity issue with the musical. In order to tryout for a performing role, 1 must be in a choir class. No exceptions. Such a policy suggests an air of elitism, which is conspicuously counter to the recent efforts on the part of campus leadership to foster a more inclusive and equitable school climate.
Rajesh, who yearned to have an opportunity to try out for her school’s signature performing-arts event, is familiar with this policy. “We should at least be able to audition, even if we don’t have a choir background. We still want to perform,” said Rajesh.
McNevin is also disappointed with the policy of excluding non-choir students. “Any activity, all activities should be fully inclusive,” said McNevin.
It’s hard to argue with the choir department’s appeal to an audience. It enjoys great popularity while other preforming arts play to more than a few empty chairs.
Drama often struggles to fill the front row. “The choir musicals are always really good but we don’t get as big of an audience and as much of a representation,” said Rajesh.
Junior Ellie Olson, a 3-year jazz band member, agreed that the student body does not show the symphonic band enough support. “More students would definitely be beneficial to the program,” said Olson.
Campolindo choir has become a kind of performing-arts monopoly, with its success pulling funding, interest, and participation away from equally noble programs.
At Campolindo, not all electives are equal.
While there is much to celebrate about our choir department, we should also be considering the cost of its accomplishments. In addition to overshadowing the rest of our performing arts, the choir program tasks its participants with an excessive commitment of time and effort for a high school experience.
As more and more of our incoming freshman are hypnotized by the choir limelight, many other electives will continue to struggle to fill sections. Some many simply disappear altogether.
I didn’t learn this in an elective course, but it seems appropriate here: If the French Revolution told us anything, it’s that a spoiled few oppressing a majority will only result in greater unrest.
kelly • Feb 25, 2020 at 12:04 pm
bring out the guillotine!!!
Ethan Cho • Feb 23, 2020 at 3:08 pm
Re the point about “all inclusivity”:
There’s a rather profound misunderstanding of the economics behind the show. There is a $50K+ sum that needs to be invested at bare minimum to produce a show of this caliber. Most of the shows that are played here are high profile endeavors that cost tens of thousands of dollars to simply obtain a license to perform it on top of the rest of the budget for sets and costuming and the like. For example, phantom’s licensing cost last year was $10,000. With the amount of money being invested into this venture the program needs to have people that know what they’re doing and that are capable of doing so in order to make the investment worthwhile. That means that if you want to sing, join choir.
For students that are not in choir that want to participate in the show they can either join the pit orchestra if they are in the instrumental department (like I am) or volunteer with the tech club; they take on a few more interested students to assist the existing club around this time,.
Cathy Kenderski • Feb 20, 2020 at 10:24 pm
I find it troubling that the author writes extensively about how choir negatively impacts mental health, yet has very little evidence to back her claims. For many, choir is a release. Data seems to back this: a study from the University of Oxford found that singing in a choir greatly improves mental and physiological well being. Those that are in choir, particularly those who have participated in choir for several years, are there because they have a deep appreciation for the caliber and beauty of the program. Additionally, the author mentions the effect of field trips on mental health. Our field trips, like many other aspects of the choral program, are purely optional. No one is under any obligation to attend. I’d also like to draw attention to Jack’s point above: one must take notice of the conflicting messages in this piece. Is the musical an elitist, grueling production takes resources from other electives, or a dazzling, Broadway level performance? I am disappointed with the misinformation within this article.
Stephen Vojta • Feb 20, 2020 at 7:46 pm
As someone who is extremely invested in choir, yet not being in the class, I can advocate and defend that the musical isn’t an elitist choir performance. Instrumental musicians, who are mentioned to be excluded, have the amazing opportunity to be part of the pit orchestra. Non musicians participate too, from the tech crew to the stage management and have a blast doing it with no feeling of the “elite” choir. With the annual musical being so profitable to the school and its reputation, feelings have to be hurt to get to the fact that choir kids are the most qualified for those roles, and being in that very class automatically proves their long term commitment. Additionally, their wide variety of concerts offer more than just choir kids, but an array of other performing arts, from accompanying string groups to the rhythm section at the pops concert. So , like any outside of school commitments, like sports, academics can get challenging but the experience you get from Roberts is truly one of a kind.
Shawn Alfredo • Feb 20, 2020 at 4:32 pm
Your argument rests on the fact that the musical is grueling and elitist, but then turn around and call the Campolindo musical “A Broadway style show”. In order for the musical to be the quality it has been, it has to be a big time commitment. We chose to participate in it, it’s not forced upon us. We sign a contract that tells us it’s going to be a lot of work.
I would say this criticism is similar to what the Cross Country team gets. (To which I’m also a part of) Yes, people complain that it’s a lot of work and and big commitment, but that’s what it takes to be the best in the state.
The SMALLEST Violin to the people that say it’s “Unfair” and “To much work”. We do this because we love the arts and the music, anyone who does not share our passion does not understand.
Makayla Erickson • Feb 20, 2020 at 1:40 pm
As a choir student, I would like to address a few of the points you made in your article.
“The choir program causes students extreme stress.”
Music is shown to improve mental health. For many of us, it is the most relaxed class of the day. If you want to talk about stress levels and students, talk about required English or math courses, not a performing art.
“Students are required to miss classes.”
Musical rehearsals and performances never come in conflict with classes. The only students that miss class for the reasons you give are upper choirs who have made the commitment and want to pursue music further. It’s really no different than school sports that make students miss afternoon classes on a regular basis.
“It is too much commitment for the students.”
Every student chooses how much they want to commit to the program. There are freshman classes up to audition choirs, and the musical is an optional choice for students. It’s a commitment of a couple of months of rehearsal- which, again, is no different from school sports.
“The musical is elitist.”
A primary part of the musical is vocal work- onstage performance is just another layer added. Students can be involved in the musical in other ways, from playing in the orchestra to being on the tech crew to participating in set construction.
“This program oppresses the other programs on campus!”
I feel like I need to say this: High school electives are in NO WAY on the same level as the French Revolution! We do not actively oppress other programs- as Mr. Roberts said, schedules are made months in advance and arrangements are made to make everything run smoothly. Funds are proportional to the number of students in the program- as the biggest on campus, it makes sense that we need more resources to provide opportunities for everyone involved. You wouldn’t give $100 to a class with less than 100 participants and the same amount to a class of 300, right? The program heads are attempting to make everything as equitable as possible. The simple fact of the matter is, more students are interested in choir than other programs, and resources are needed to make sure each student is able to succeed at the level they aspire to.
Jack Pieper • Feb 19, 2020 at 9:11 am
Your argument rests on the fact that the musical is grueling and elitist, but then turn around and call the Campolindo musical “A Broadway style show”. In order for the musical to be the quality it has been, it has to be a big time commitment. We chose to participate in it, it’s not forced upon us. We sign a contract that tells us it’s going to be a lot of work.
I would say this criticism is similar to what the Cross Country team gets. (To which I’m also a part of) Yes, people complain that it’s a lot of work and and big commitment, but that’s what it takes to be the best in the state.
The SMALLEST Violin to the people that say it’s “Unfair” and “To much work”. We do this because we love the arts and the music, anyone who does not share our passion does not understand.
Ryan • Feb 18, 2020 at 7:16 pm
bro you posted cringe !
Tate eames • Feb 18, 2020 at 6:57 pm
First i would like to let it be known i have a HUGE problem with this article. Second as someone who actively participates in two choirs I think the way you portray this whole situation is terrible. Everything is optional I felt no urge whatsoever to audition for the musical. In the program i have never felt any urge to be forced to do anything I didn’t get forced into chamber because i had the right voice, it’s because i wanted to be there and so did the other 31 participants. I think you should’ve put much more thought into this as it slanders a program that is doing much more good than you have shown.